Better document inventory by project type
- Who asked
- Architects and permit expediters
- Why it matters
- Different project types need different sheet sets. A clearer inventory reduces missing-document corrections at intake.
Workflow updates
Workflow updates we're exploring with permit teams.
Requests and workflow improvements we're evaluating from applicants, contractors, architects, and review teams.
Being refined from user feedback
Project-level readiness timeline
- Who asked
- Contractors managing multiple permits
- Why it matters
- Teams want a single view of where each packet sits across precheck, corrections, and resubmission.
In-app guidance for correction tasks
- Who asked
- Applicants responding to reviewer comments
- Why it matters
- Correction notes are easier to act on when the relevant sheet, note, or field is surfaced inline.
Clearer reviewer confirmation notes
- Who asked
- Municipal review teams
- Why it matters
- Short, structured confirmations help applicants understand what was accepted and what still needs attention.
Requested by permit teams
Permit fee context helper
- Who asked
- Applicants and small contractors
- Why it matters
- People often submit packets without understanding fee structures. Context at intake reduces back-and-forth.
Multi-jurisdiction packet templates
- Who asked
- Architects working across cities
- Why it matters
- Each jurisdiction has its own packet expectations. Templates per jurisdiction reduce rework.
Resubmission comparison view
- Who asked
- Reviewers and applicants
- Why it matters
- A side-by-side of what changed between submissions speeds up second-round review.
Shared report links for applicants
- Who asked
- Contractors sharing status with owners
- Why it matters
- A read-only link summarizing readiness avoids forwarding screenshots and PDFs.
Integration conversations
Parcel and zoning references
- Who asked
- Architects and review teams
- Why it matters
- Pulling parcel and zoning context into the packet view reduces lookup time during precheck.
Local code reference sources
- Who asked
- Reviewers and applicants
- Why it matters
- Linking referenced code sections in correction notes helps applicants address comments accurately.
Reviewer dashboard pilots
- Who asked
- Municipal review teams
- Why it matters
- Some teams want a lightweight queue view alongside their existing systems. We're piloting with a few groups.
Export and webhook needs
- Who asked
- Permit expediter firms
- Why it matters
- Teams want to push packet status into their own trackers and CRMs without manual copy/paste.
How we work on this list
These items come from real conversations with permit teams. We refine, scope, and pilot them with a few groups before shipping broadly. Final permit decisions always remain with qualified reviewers and the relevant authority.